my danish romance Posted May 19, 2009 Author Posted May 19, 2009 But I cant underdstand.:/why should they do it? i mean is it neccesary so is it nice not to hear audienece?As I understand they are still able to hear the crowd through the "in ear monitors" as they are playing the music, but yeah, somebody said on this board, that Billie Joe once commented on this issue, by saying that he didn't want to use the "in ear monitors" cause he likes to hear the crowd...I guess with the technology being so advanced nowadays where you can get the "in ear monitors", hear the music, and the crowd while also protecting your hearing, then it is sort of a "no brainer"....Im just pathetic about it, I still dont like it for some reson.....I'm so immature and childish.....Fuck technology!!!!(Oh the irony of saying that on an internet forum)
rachiek Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 in-ear-monitors are a combination of monitors and ear plugs and do an amazing job at blocking soundthe website from the company who makes in ears for most of the music industry has had green day on there list of bands that own there in-ear-monitors for at least 2 years which is when i became interested in buying a pair for my self
my danish romance Posted May 19, 2009 Author Posted May 19, 2009 The lesson here is: Bruce Springsteen's a god damned beast.Bruce Springsteen is awsome...Still rocking, and he's like 60 years´oldOne of the greatest songwriters everone of the greatest live perfomersGreatest stadium act(without ear plugs)Bruce Springsteen: Original Rocker!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.