Z J Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Your arguments are bullshit and noone cares about them. Trilogy minus most of the Dos is one of their best works. We all know you hate it so there is no good reason to keep explaining why you hate it. I love the trilogy and you can go jack off to AI garbage too. Please, for entertainment, explain why my arguments are bullshit but yours (I haven't seen a real argument, only angrily stated finalities) are so enlightened
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 So he has a good vocabulary and that makes him self-righteous? I guess all of us English majors are fucked, then. It's not about the vocabulary. See...if you people had any sort of social skills you'd understand where this is coming from. It's the way it's said and phrased.
Z J Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 It's phrases like that...sounds so self-righteous and mightier than though. You say that to a group of people irl and you get eye-rolls. I'm not trying to be self righteous, but if you're in a debate and you use logical fallacies, people in real life will call you on it. You're argument contained a lot of those, so I stated as such, nothing more
WhiteTim Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 It's phrases like that...sounds so self-righteous and mightier than though. You say that to a group of people irl and you get eye-rolls. So knowing words that a high school graduate should know makes him self righteous?
Z J Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 It's not about the vocabulary. See...if you people had any sort of social skills you'd understand where this is coming from. It's the way it's said and phrased. Btw, how was Seagull's last post not self-righteous? Just wondering
Anaïs. Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 It's not about the vocabulary. See...if you people had any sort of social skills you'd understand where this is coming from. It's the way it's said and phrased. Because you have such social skills. Remember the racist rant you got suspended for? That was a dazzling display of social grace. If your argument is fallacious--which it was--there's nothing wrong in saying so. If anything, Zack is treating you with respect by responding to your position with formality rather than "That's fucking stupid."
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Because you have such social skills. Remember the racist rant you got suspended for? That was a dazzling display of social grace. If your argument is fallacious--which it was--there's nothing wrong in saying so. If anything, Zack is treating you with respect by responding to your position with formality rather than "That's fucking stupid." I'd prefer that response instead of some old English novel. And you think my online behavior is at all similar to the real world? No, because it's the internet, and nothing here is "real." My relationships in the real world matter. My actions in the real world matter. Obviously you can't differentiate. In my opinion, the internet doesn't count as a social life. It's the opposite.
Anaïs. Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I'd prefer that response instead of some old English novel. And you think my online behavior is at all similar to the real world? No, because it's the internet, and nothing here is "real." My relationships in the real world matter. My actions in the real world matter. Obviously you can't differentiate. In my opinion, the internet doesn't count as a social life. It's the opposite.Then how the fuck can you judge OUR social behavior via the internet?! The contradiction is mind-blowing.
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I get that my whole point here is completely lost on people because I think entirely differently. We have different ideas of life, so everything that may seem sane to you guys seems very weird and peculiar to me. And that's how it always will be until you become exposed to my world or I succumb to yours.
Z J Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I'd prefer that response instead of some old English novel. And you think my online behavior is at all similar to the real world? No, because it's the internet, and nothing here is "real." My relationships in the real world matter. My actions in the real world matter. Obviously you can't differentiate. In my opinion, the internet doesn't count as a social life. It's the opposite. Implying fallacious is a word found in old English novels? Logical fallacies are a basic part of debate (or shouldn't be, for that matter). Nobody here is even discussing our freaking social lives. You seem very strung up on explaining to us that you have one. We get it. And we are proud of you
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Then how the fuck can you judge OUR social behavior via the internet?! The contradiction is mind-blowing. Ok you're right. You could be pretending to be anti social/strange just like I'm pretending. Good point.
Anaïs. Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Ok you're right. You could be pretending to be anti social/strange just like I'm pretending. Good point. Or I could just not be pretending at all and actually be perfectly social. I don't know if you've noticed, but we Trilogy haters have friends here. Quite a few, in fact. And one of us was made an admin in less than a year, which you don't get by being antisocial.
Z J Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Or I could just not be pretending at all and actually be perfectly social. I don't know if you've noticed, but we Trilogy haters have friends here. Quite a few, in fact. And one of us was made an admin in less than a year, which you don't get by being antisocial. But you use big words….clearly you aren't social.
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Or I could just not be pretending at all and actually be perfectly social. I don't know if you've noticed, but we Trilogy haters have friends here. Quite a few, in fact. And one of us was made an admin in less than a year, which you don't get by being antisocial. This is sarcasm right? Or did you actually mean that being friends with people online, particularly and admin, makes you a social person? When did internet friends become a source of social interaction? That's sad right there.
Anaïs. Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 But you use big words.clearly you aren't social. Alas, you have discovered my lurking, ebon secret, you malevolent archfiend.
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 But whatever. Done here. I won't get through to you partly because of your need to defend your own actions and the obvious differences in how we define social interaction.
WhiteTim Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 This is sarcasm right? Or did you actually mean that being friends with people online, particularly and admin, makes you a social person? When did internet friends become a source of social interaction? That's sad right there. Why do you think folks on here have no real life or friends?
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Why do you think folks on here have no real life or friends? Alas, you have discovered my lurking, ebon secret, you malevolent archfiend. Because of phrases like that
Anaïs. Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 This is sarcasm right? Or did you actually mean that being friends with people online, particularly and admin, makes you a social person? When did internet friends become a source of social interaction? That's sad right there. I'm saying that one doesn't rise from nothing to one of the three people running a site within twelve months without possessing a certain force of personality. You know what I think is sad? That you have to resort to these bitter, pointless ad hominem attacks when you've lost a debate. Because of phrases like that Yes, I was clearly serious there. You've nailed it.
DookieLukie Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I'm saying that one doesn't rise from nothing to one of the three people running a site within twelve months without possessing a certain force of personality. You know what I think is sad? That you have to resort to these bitter, pointless ad hominem attacks when you've lost a debate. Yes, I was clearly serious there. You've nailed it. A homeschooled kid fits in just fine with a bunch of other anti-social homeschooled kids. That's what I mean about different worlds. You might have social success here, but not in the real world. And what debate did I lose?
Z J Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Because of phrases like that Does intellect intimidate you? To the point that you can justify insulting other people while discussing MUSIC? That, my friend, is sad.
Anaïs. Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 A homeschooled kid fits in just fine with a bunch of other anti-social homeschooled kids. That's what I mean about different worlds. You might have social success here, but not in the real world. And what debate did I lose? 1. And you know my level of success in the real world...how? 2. The one where you asserted that all we Trilogy haters do it for attention. You've forfeited it by resorting to personal attacks and abandoning any sort of reasoned argument for your original position.
Sauli Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I have figured out the eternal cycle of GDC. Steven comes in, says he hates AI and 2st CB, people tell him to fuck off and get tons of rep. Seriously though, could we just stop this shitstorm already? Its getting ridiculous.
WhiteTim Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 Does intellect intimidate you? To the point that you can justify insulting other people while discussing MUSIC? That, my friend, is sad. Well in order to have a real life socially is you can't know any big words...
Spike Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I think that's enough. DookieLukie, you're being an asshole. Now go back to your real world if you're as above arguing over pointless shit on the internet as you claim to be.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.