Dookie93 Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 I didn't even know there was a different Whatsername, this is just bullshit though! I know this may be ironic but I want to see a picture of her, can anyone provide one? I'm not joking either.
Moffie Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 She signed away her right to sue when she signed her contract for Berkeley. It says in the contract that they are allowed to release future promos/pictures if your image is involved to promote the musical. But yeah, we've been talking about this in the AI Musical thread for a while. I honestly thinks she's trying to sue to have people remember that she was part of the cast once.
spark in the night Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 how is this causing negative emotional distress? she's in a promo video, woop de fricken doo would she rather NOT be included in all the promo shit and just be known as the unknown understudy??\ your choice
Guest Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 Which one is she? Anyone know? I would've thought that surely being filmed in the 21 guns video, she knew it would be broadcasted publicly, so surely that's giving some form of tacit consent, if she had a problem with being filmed for a music promo video, she should have left.
Moffie Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 Which one is she? Anyone know? I would've thought that surely being filmed in the 21 guns video, she knew it would be broadcasted publicly, so surely that's giving some form of tacit consent, if she had a problem with being filmed for a music promo video, she should have left. She looks a lot like Mary. She's only seen a few times for only a couple of seconds.
Guest Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 She looks a lot like Mary. She's only seen a few times for only a couple of seconds. That's one hell of an overreaction for a couple of seconds airtime then, isn't it?
heartscollide Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 I still don't understand why she's doing this!
ifmemoryserves Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 I still don't understand why she's doing this! She must hate the musical as much as BJWolf does.
heartscollide Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 She must hate the musical as much as BJWolf does. I bet she's like "UGH I HAYE HOW THEY JUST TAG ALONG WITH GREEN DAY. THEY ARE SUCH DICKHEADS!!!!!!!!!"
lizziebix Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 I'm sure there is a lot of anger and jealousy involved in this. But it's just sad that she chose to sue. It doesn't make her look any better in the real or theatre world.
amy_runs Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 I would sue if a company publicized videos/pictures of me without my consent. dats not cool
Moffie Posted August 14, 2010 Posted August 14, 2010 I would sue if a company publicized videos/pictures of me without my consent. dats not cool Unless you specifically look for her, you don't see her at all.
BringMoreKnives Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 Wow, what a money-hungry bitch. Why the hell would she do that? So her face is in advertisements. Who gives a flying fuck? I want pancakes. (sorry just felt the urge to type that for some reason.)
spark in the night Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 yeah I think she just blew her career with this one is any production gonna want to hire her for any roles when she acts like a psycho idiot?
plaid ducky Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 I would sue if a company publicized videos/pictures of me without my consent. dats not cool I'm pretty sure that when she originally signed her contract for Berkeley and it mentions the use of her image in promotional materials. When the show headed to Broadway, they did use those same promotional materials earlier on but have since changed it so show the Broadway cast instead of the Berkeley cast. That being said, she was not the only one to have not transferred to Broadway with the musical. Matt Caplan who was the original Tunny, even back during the workshops, was replaced with Stark Sands. Matt had a much larger role than Morgan but you don't see him suing... even if he was disappointed with not transferring.
Moffie Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 I'm pretty sure that when she originally signed her contract for Berkeley and it mentions the use of her image in promotional materials. When the show headed to Broadway, they did use those same promotional materials earlier on but have since changed it so show the Broadway cast instead of the Berkeley cast. That being said, she was not the only one to have not transferred to Broadway with the musical. Matt Caplan who was the original Tunny, even back during the workshops, was replaced with Stark Sands. Matt had a much larger role than Morgan but you don't see him suing... even if he was disappointed with not transferring. THIS. And Matt has two things this chick doesn't have: CLASS and PROFESSIONALISM.
ScreamsInSilence815 Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 Wow. Talk about super-overeaction. Unfortunately, she does have a case if she never gave her permission. But how would this ruin her career or anything?
Pedestrian9394 Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 She's just jealous because the musical was amazing and she was just a FORMER cast member.
watsername182 Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 She must hate the musical as much as BJWolf does.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.