RevolutionRegained Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 that sounds kind of mean O.ointeresting either way..
justcause Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Bittersweet."It was a big, dumb pop record...""the moronic... Basketcase."Hm. Thanks for the scans.Yeah, both of those statements jumped out at me, too - let me just say that 'dumb' and 'moronic' are not terms that apply to any Green Day song. On the other hand, they can be applied to many rock journalists, lol!
Compulsive Habits Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Hey, that's cool. I'd love a rock encyclopedia, wonder if my local book shop has them for sale? hmm.
LamBCHoP Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 I'm pretty sure I've read something like that before in my school library back in the day, except it was about them at woodstock
thinkgreen2172 Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 thats pretty cool. & thank youu for the scans too.!!.:]
snaredrummer9 Posted March 28, 2007 Author Posted March 28, 2007 omg i noticed an error on one page. like in one of the little discription thing about a picture, they spelled Billie Joe's name wrong. it's "Billy Joe"
Eirik Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 omg i noticed an error on one page. like in one of the little discription thing about a picture, they spelled Billie Joe's name wrong. it's "Billy Joe" there were more mistakes, as far as i've learned Dookie was released in 1994, not 1993 as it says in the article, and American Idiot in 2004 (they corrected that later in the article though) and why didn't Mike get his full birth name on print, like Tre got... PS: i know it's a really old thread, but it came up by random searching, and i'm really bored
Hermione Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 Well I'd never seen that before. What a totally retarded article, sounds like it was written by someone who knows absolutely nothing about (and hates) Green Day. A trained chimp could've cobbled it together better.
Adrii1039 Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 Well I'd never seen that before. What a totally retarded article, sounds like it was written by someone who knows absolutely nothing about (and hates) Green Day. A trained chimp could've cobbled it together better.I was thinking the same thing after i read the first few lines. >.<
Jack96 Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 Cool. Thanks for posting Exactly what i was about to say.
snaredrummer9 Posted July 15, 2008 Author Posted July 15, 2008 there were more mistakes, as far as i've learned Dookie was released in 1994, not 1993 as it says in the article, and American Idiot in 2004 (they corrected that later in the article though) and why didn't Mike get his full birth name on print, like Tre got... PS: i know it's a really old thread, but it came up by random searching, and i'm really boredwow, you really were bored.well for one thing, it's an Encyclopedia, not an article. an encyclopedia is a reference. remember that. i know i made that mistake in the first post but now i know. and (since the thread came up) i learned that they didn't give great details for everyone mentioned, it basically gave basic info about a band. but hey, at least they got 2 pages of credit, unlike some other bands that only got 1 paragraph.
one8two Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 thnks for the scans, not perfect, but i haven't seen it before.
AliceInWonderLand Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 thnks for the scans, not perfect, but i haven't seen it before.well someone's cheese slid of his cracker
snaredrummer9 Posted July 15, 2008 Author Posted July 15, 2008 thnks for the scans, not perfect, but i haven't seen it before.sorry. the fuzzy-ness kind of came with the book, i didn't realize it until i brought it home....eep.well someone's cheese slid of his cracker...you're eating cheese and crackers without me, aren't you?
one8two Posted July 15, 2008 Posted July 15, 2008 sorry. the fuzzy-ness kind of came with the book, i didn't realize it until i brought it home....eep....you're eating cheese and crackers without me, aren't you?pardon me,i thought the scans were fine you can read them fine. that's what matters.i meant the encyclopedias material was not perfect.just clarifying.
snaredrummer9 Posted July 15, 2008 Author Posted July 15, 2008 pardon me,i thought the scans were fine you can read them fine. that's what matters.i meant the encyclopedias material was not perfect.just clarifying.well a lot of my friends were complaining about the fuzzy-ness so i kind of would figure...oh yeah, i think i said this earlier: i learned that they didn't give great details for everyone mentioned, it basically gave the basic info about a band. so it's not just Green Day, they did that to some other bands.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.