Jump to content

Father of All Motherfuckers album - News and Media Coverage


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jirachi said:

Bratwurst came from people making jokey fake tracklistings i think?

I can assure you Bratwurst is very much a real Green Day song. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nightlife said:

I can assure you Bratwurst is very much a real Green Day song. 

Shhh, that's a government secret, we can't just tell anybody! u_u

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, DookieLukie said:

If Magnum Opus is Hillary, we'll have another phoned in, poser album.

I heard it won't be available for purchase or streaming in the swing states

  • Haha 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, Flashback said:

Just take a look at TESS or ASCAP, you‘ll see

You can transfer any of your intellectual property rights you want for whatever reason you want tho. You said they're non-transferable which is wrong.

Also they can own them and therefore show up as such on ASCAP and still give Warner (or anyone else) exclusive licence over them, which is basically the same as Warner owning them for the years that that lasts.

Posted

There’s a lot of artists who don’t own their own publishing escp the old stuff artists like Rolling Stones old label owns the publishing to the songs 

artists owning their publishing has only been happening in the last 25 years or so 

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, green day is said:

You can transfer any of your intellectual property rights you want for whatever reason you want tho. You said they're non-transferable which is wrong.

Also they can own them and therefore show up as such on ASCAP and still give Warner (or anyone else) exclusive licence over them, which is basically the same as Warner owning them for the years that that lasts.

Seems that Europe is a bit composer-friendlier than the US 😂 

But that‘s exactly the point: Warner owns the exclusive distribution rights, but not the record itself, this is what i wanted to say.

Posted
54 minutes ago, WhiteTim said:

There’s a lot of artists who don’t own their own publishing escp the old stuff artists like Rolling Stones old label owns the publishing to the songs 

artists owning their publishing has only been happening in the last 25 years or so 

Do the masters always come back to the artist after a certain amount of time? I heard Noel Gallagher on about this recently, seems he is getting the masters of all the Oasis music after 30 years, which is in a 3-4 years time.

starts at the 50 second mark here if you are interested 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Alan86 said:

Do the masters always come back to the artist after a certain amount of time? I heard Noel Gallagher on about this recently, seems he is getting the masters of all the Oasis music after 30 years, which is in a 3-4 years time.

starts at the 50 second mark here if you are interested 

 

It all depends on labels & contracts etc 

Posted
1 minute ago, WhiteTim said:

It all depends on labels & contracts etc 

I was thinking that could be the case.

Posted

I love how active they are on social media right now. It's only natural considering the announcement was just made but I sure hope they keep it up! Also hoping they'll make up for the lack of pro shot footage during the RevRad era.The use of the AI logo though.. That's a no from me dawg. 

RqpORwc.jpg

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nightlife said:

pro shot footage

Oh god I'm getting flashbacks to summer 2017

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nightlife said:

I love how active they are on social media right now. It's only natural considering the announcement was just made but I sure hope they keep it up! Also hoping they'll make up for the lack of pro shot footage during the RevRad era.The use of the AI logo though.. That's a no from me dawg. 

RqpORwc.jpg

It's the most recognized GD related logo, so from a marketing perspective it makes the most sense to use it. If the not-as-well-informed general public saw the barfing unicorn logo they most likely wouldn't know wtf it meant (which is kind of funny...but they want to push sales) 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, punxie89 said:

It's the most recognized GD related logo, so from a marketing perspective it makes the most sense to use it. If the not-as-well-informed general public saw the barfing unicorn logo they most likely wouldn't know wtf it meant (which is kind of funny...but they want to push sales) 

I get that, but it doesn't make it valid to use a 15 year old logo in my opinion. It just feels cheap and wrong. Green Day is always about moving forward and they seem particularly keen on that for this era so I don't get why they made the decision to do this. Why not use that god awful Green Day Ketchup Font™ featured on the equally awful album cover instead? 

Posted

Everyone’s calling it ketchup but I really think it’s meant to be nail polish. Just saying. 🙂

Posted
Just now, pacejunkie punk said:

Everyone’s calling it ketchup but I really think it’s meant to be nail polish. Just saying. 🙂

I don't think it looks like ketchup either, I just love how people call it that lol 

Posted
Just now, Nightlife said:

I don't think it looks like ketchup either, I just love how people call it that lol 

Got it. Carry on

Posted
11 minutes ago, Nightlife said:

I get that, but it doesn't make it valid to use a 15 year old logo in my opinion. It just feels cheap and wrong. Green Day is always about moving forward and they seem particularly keen on that for this era so I don't get why they made the decision to do this. Why not use that god awful Green Day Ketchup Font™ featured on the equally awful album cover instead? 

😂 I can't figure out what it's supposed to be. Coloured art glue? Icing? Nail polish? Paint? I guess it's because it was band logos not writing per se 

Posted

It looks like ketchup or raised fabric paint to me

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, kaylubd said:

It looks like ketchup or raised fabric paint to me

I going with raised fabric paint, but ketchup is funnier 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Looks like the paint they were huffing when coming up with that cover to me. 

Posted

It would be great if there was an entertainment lawyer in our community!! 

But is this album cover more punk than rev rads generic cover ? 

Posted

it's clearly acrylic paint???

 

thought people were joking when they called it ketchup

  • Like 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, luketrebilliemike said:

It would be great if there was an entertainment lawyer in our community!! 

But is this album cover more punk than rev rads generic cover ? 

This Album cover is the most random cover ever.

Posted
5 minutes ago, green day is said:

it's clearly acrylic paint???

 

thought people were joking when they called it ketchup

Nvm haha

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...