Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/11/2026 in all areas
-
Thought people may be interested in this, it's fan made but very cool! It's a bit of a gimmick but it's fun https://www.ebay.com/itm/2060629668345 points
-
Being from Scotland & not the USA, don’t really know much if anything about the Super Bowl/NFL, but I really enjoyed the “mega mix”. Why is no-one here talking about how great Billies voice sounded ? 🗽(I’ve also never heard of Bad Bunny either)5 points
-
I’m a sucker for when he wears his good fitted leather jacket + plain black tee combo. He looked like such a hot Rock Star. 🤩4 points
-
But you could also claim Bad Bunny was a watered down version of himself. He has spoken out explicitly about ICE as recently as his Grammy acceptance speech the week before. He also dressed in drag in one of his music videos (Yo Perreo Sola, which is one of the songs he included in his Super Bowl performance), and if I'm not mistaken he's also worn dresses to some red carpet events or magazine shoots. I know there were rumors about him also wearing something like that for the Super Bowl. But he didn't. He could have also easily done a 15 minute medley with only songs that more political or more of a celebration of Puerto Rican culture, and skip all the dancing and sex songs and "I have a girlfriend in every country" songs. He also didn't call out ICE even though he has done it before. And I think it's okay that he didn't. He wanted to send out a message of unity and celebration of a culture, and directly calling out ICE would have been more divisive and would have been all people talked about afterwards. I think he presented the version of himself that he felt would be most palatable to most people without giving up his core essence (he couldn't give that up anyways, unless he had only sung covers with back up of All-American all white artists and dancers). My point is, I don't think Bad Bunny was particularly bold in anything he did. His act was still super powerful, without a doubt, especially because we're in a climate where looking like him, sounding like him, speaking his language, has almost become a crime in the US. But I think some people perceive it as exceptionally bold due to a lack of familiarity with his music and performances. Meanwhile there might be some people in his fan base, or queer folk, who are disappointed that he didn't use this platform to be the most bold he can be. Undoubtedly Bad Bunny's performance was more impactful and powerful, but he had more time, more budget, and just looking the way he does, and singing in Spanish, was going to be a statement, no matter which songs he chose or how the act had been choreographed. So as you say, not matter what, Bad Bunny's performance was always going to be more impactful. On the other hand I also feel we are grasping at straws here. He could have worn a t-shirt with a huge Virgen de Guadalupe on it if he really wanted to make a statement, not a tiny medallion that needs to be pointed out for people to notice it. I also doubt that they are so deluded as to think that them singing "I'm not a part of the MAGA agenda" would have upstaged Bad Bunny (or at least I hope they are not that deluded 😅). Short of Billie dropping his pants and taking a a literal shit on a bucket of ice, I don't think there's anything Green Day could have done to upstage Bad Bunny. They just didn't have the time or space to do that. I think they chose to include two of their most political songs, and leave it at that, and just put their focus on putting the best show they could in just 5 minutes. We all know how much Billie struggled to put together a 30 minute set for iHeartRadio some years ago, imagine they pain they must have gone through trying to figure out how to make the most powerful 5 minute performance they could do. We just have to accept they were not as bold or as political as we had expected them to be (I also think for non-American folks who are not familiar with the Super Bowl at all, such as myself, the expectation of how much stage time they'd get was way off. I certainly expected them to have a least 20 minutes not realizing that not even the half time was that long. So my expectations of what they could do were also hyperinflated just because of how much more time I thought they had.) But their act was still political, and could have been even more watered down if they really hadn't wanted to make a statement at all (they could have just done a Time of Your Life, Basket Case, BOBD, WMUWSE, WICA medley, people would have still recognized the songs, and be done with that).3 points
-
You are right, my bad. 😞 same, same and same. I thought it they sounded and looked great.3 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
..............im good 😭 too rich for my blood. me too 😭2 points
-
2 points
-
I also something about the Rebel Loon sticker on his guitar showing support for Minnesota.2 points
-
Yeah I’m scared, because I really want one2 points
-
Yes, they deserve a break. But the break is the perfect time to release the Saviors Tour live album / DVD!2 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I think that was at the Pier 29 show unless I'm mistaken, not the Super Bowl opening show.1 point
-
1 point
-
I just loves that Billie's hair was so floofy during the pre-game performance that people questioned if it was a wig 😂1 point
-
Here's another really rare photo from my collection of magazine clippings https://www.instagram.com/p/DUdkBXjApTk/?igsh=MXJ1dHc3NWx1MXg2cw==1 point
-
I think it always would have been because he was the headliner and it was a great performance and a huge production. I don't think playing it so safe that the entire press and fan takeaway from the performance is that they played it super safe was necessary to prevent upstaging1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
They will definitely be a LOT Haha1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point