Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. jengd

    jengd

    Members - Supporter


    • Points

      8

    • Posts

      8,389


  2. Mollyluna

    Mollyluna

    Members - Supporter


    • Points

      7

    • Posts

      828


  3. sergiewoo

    sergiewoo

    Members


    • Points

      7

    • Posts

      276


  4. CocaColaX

    CocaColaX

    Members


    • Points

      6

    • Posts

      267


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/11/2026 in all areas

  1. But you could also claim Bad Bunny was a watered down version of himself. He has spoken out explicitly about ICE as recently as his Grammy acceptance speech the week before. He also dressed in drag in one of his music videos (Yo Perreo Sola, which is one of the songs he included in his Super Bowl performance), and if I'm not mistaken he's also worn dresses to some red carpet events or magazine shoots. I know there were rumors about him also wearing something like that for the Super Bowl. But he didn't. He could have also easily done a 15 minute medley with only songs that more political or more of a celebration of Puerto Rican culture, and skip all the dancing and sex songs and "I have a girlfriend in every country" songs. He also didn't call out ICE even though he has done it before. And I think it's okay that he didn't. He wanted to send out a message of unity and celebration of a culture, and directly calling out ICE would have been more divisive and would have been all people talked about afterwards. I think he presented the version of himself that he felt would be most palatable to most people without giving up his core essence (he couldn't give that up anyways, unless he had only sung covers with back up of All-American all white artists and dancers). My point is, I don't think Bad Bunny was particularly bold in anything he did. His act was still super powerful, without a doubt, especially because we're in a climate where looking like him, sounding like him, speaking his language, has almost become a crime in the US. But I think some people perceive it as exceptionally bold due to a lack of familiarity with his music and performances. Meanwhile there might be some people in his fan base, or queer folk, who are disappointed that he didn't use this platform to be the most bold he can be. Undoubtedly Bad Bunny's performance was more impactful and powerful, but he had more time, more budget, and just looking the way he does, and singing in Spanish, was going to be a statement, no matter which songs he chose or how the act had been choreographed. So as you say, not matter what, Bad Bunny's performance was always going to be more impactful. On the other hand I also feel we are grasping at straws here. He could have worn a t-shirt with a huge Virgen de Guadalupe on it if he really wanted to make a statement, not a tiny medallion that needs to be pointed out for people to notice it. I also doubt that they are so deluded as to think that them singing "I'm not a part of the MAGA agenda" would have upstaged Bad Bunny (or at least I hope they are not that deluded ๐Ÿ˜…). Short of Billie dropping his pants and taking a a literal shit on a bucket of ice, I don't think there's anything Green Day could have done to upstage Bad Bunny. They just didn't have the time or space to do that. I think they chose to include two of their most political songs, and leave it at that, and just put their focus on putting the best show they could in just 5 minutes. We all know how much Billie struggled to put together a 30 minute set for iHeartRadio some years ago, imagine they pain they must have gone through trying to figure out how to make the most powerful 5 minute performance they could do. We just have to accept they were not as bold or as political as we had expected them to be (I also think for non-American folks who are not familiar with the Super Bowl at all, such as myself, the expectation of how much stage time they'd get was way off. I certainly expected them to have a least 20 minutes not realizing that not even the half time was that long. So my expectations of what they could do were also hyperinflated just because of how much more time I thought they had.) But their act was still political, and could have been even more watered down if they really hadn't wanted to make a statement at all (they could have just done a Time of Your Life, Basket Case, BOBD, WMUWSE, WICA medley, people would have still recognized the songs, and be done with that).
    6 points
  2. Being from Scotland & not the USA, donโ€™t really know much if anything about the Super Bowl/NFL, but I really enjoyed the โ€œmega mixโ€. Why is no-one here talking about how great Billies voice sounded ? ๐Ÿ—ฝ(Iโ€™ve also never heard of Bad Bunny either)
    6 points
  3. Thought people may be interested in this, it's fan made but very cool! It's a bit of a gimmick but it's fun https://www.ebay.com/itm/206062966834
    5 points
  4. Iโ€™m a sucker for when he wears his good fitted leather jacket + plain black tee combo. He looked like such a hot Rock Star. ๐Ÿคฉ
    4 points
  5. Yes, they deserve a break. But the break is the perfect time to release the Saviors Tour live album / DVD!
    4 points
  6. You are right, my bad. ๐Ÿ˜ž same, same and same. I thought it they sounded and looked great.
    3 points
  7. Official live releases are still happening! A good chunk of them are released digitally but plenty of bands still do physical releases. The cure just dropped a live Blu-ray last year and a live cd 2 years ago. And Depeche mode released a live album/DVD combo last year.
    2 points
  8. It's been far too long since we've had a live album/DVD from these guys. That would be amazing! There's so many great shows to choose from. It could be like Awesome as Fuck where it's performances from different cities across the tour or just from one amazing show in particular. First one that comes to mind is Chicago!....I'm not biased ๐Ÿ‘€
    2 points
  9. Yes!!! And the sunglasses made it perfect!๐Ÿ˜
    2 points
  10. ..............im good ๐Ÿ˜ญ too rich for my blood. me too ๐Ÿ˜ญ
    2 points
  11. Well for a Saviors Tour album, they'd probably use the Saviors era logo
    2 points
  12. I also something about the Rebel Loon sticker on his guitar showing support for Minnesota.
    2 points
  13. 2 points
  14. Are live albums still a thing since everything is for free on youtube? Anyways, if they do a live album, hopefully it would have the quality of Bullet in a Bible. Awesome as Fuck was a bit of a letdown in terms of sound quality..
    1 point
  15. They probably rest all 2026 and start collecting ideas and demoing in 2027
    1 point
  16. Green Day also had different logos between 2020 and 2022. I don't expect new music until at least 2028. Billie himself recently said that there's no new music to record after their recent tour.
    1 point
  17. This logo looks similar to New Years Rev ngl.
    1 point
  18. A logo like this would be good for an archival release or for Nimrods/New Years Rev
    1 point
  19. I think that was at the Pier 29 show unless I'm mistaken, not the Super Bowl opening show.
    1 point
  20. I don't wanna hear anybody else saying "Green Day played it safe"
    1 point
  21. I just loves that Billie's hair was so floofy during the pre-game performance that people questioned if it was a wig ๐Ÿ˜‚
    1 point
  22. Here's another really rare photo from my collection of magazine clippings https://www.instagram.com/p/DUdkBXjApTk/?igsh=MXJ1dHc3NWx1MXg2cw==
    1 point
  23. I think it always would have been because he was the headliner and it was a great performance and a huge production. I don't think playing it so safe that the entire press and fan takeaway from the performance is that they played it super safe was necessary to prevent upstaging
    1 point
  24. We were talking about the glasses and he delivered ๐Ÿฅฐ
    1 point
  25. I was thinking that as well. Weird timing for a new logo. Could be they just wanted something new for the super bowl event?
    1 point
  26. I really want a live album/movie/doc! Hope they will use their current momentum to announce it. ๐Ÿคž๐Ÿป
    1 point
  27. I think people are losing sight of the fact that Green Day GREEN DAY played an opening show at the Super Bowl! Thatโ€™s huge. The video has over 1.5 m views already. Must have felt amazing to them.
    1 point
  28. There is an odd angle to this of fans putting all this responsibility on Green Day to do a certain thing. Like others were saying, maybe this was a dream moment for them and they wanted to embrace it and make it a positive memory.
    1 point
  29. I don't really pay attention to emails from Green Day and I was amused when I noticed a coffee one the other day. Imagine if I'd forgotten all about them after signing up to the mailing list in 2007, then 19 years later I wonder why the fuck I'm getting emails about some coffee with a godawful name when I don't even drink it, so I look and... it's Green Day. It's a rock band trying to sell me coffee.
    1 point
  30. Are you working on it?๐Ÿ˜‚
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...