DeJennsitized Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, Jake69 said: You can leave the RevRad threads you know. But if he does that who's gonna hear him say how much better the Trilogy is?? Quote
Hermione Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 18 minutes ago, Jake69 said: You can leave the RevRad threads you know. It doesn't have to be a battle. You don't need to try and stop people posting their love for the trilogy in this thread, and hopefully @Steven Seagull knows he shouldn't try and stop people posting their love for RevRad in RevRad threads either 2 Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 It's obvious that trilogy had much better mastering done, don't be so butthurt guys. Quote
Harry Potter. Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Rev Rad's production, mixing, and mastering are unprofessional in comparison with the trilogy. At least the trilogy was good at the time. Rev Rad was an instant disappointment. Quote
Hermione Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 To me Rev Rad sounds like a standard Green Day album, while Uno Dos Tre sounded clearer. I like both 2 Quote
Eric Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Hermione said: To me Rev Rad sounds like a standard Green Day album, while Uno Dos Tre sounded clearer. I like both Yeah I just do not understand the hate. Everything is just Green Day sounding to me whether it was Trilogy or rev Rad. Rev Rad I can see did what Uno Dos or tre didn't, but still they hate it. It will grow on them over time Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 They basically just boosted the shit out of the guitars with RevRad. RevRad could be better if it sounded like Trilogy. But it sounds like some amateur mastered it. Quote
Hermione Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Eric said: Yeah I just do not understand the hate. Everything is just Green Day sounding to me whether it was Trilogy or rev Rad. Rev Rad I can see did what Uno Dos or tre didn't, but still they hate it. It will grow on them over time I just mean that's the extent of the differences in production I can hear. But in a general sense I also just think of everything they do as Green Day sounding haha. 1 Quote
Popular Post Eric Posted September 26, 2016 Popular Post Posted September 26, 2016 5 minutes ago, Hermione said: I just mean that's the extent of the differences in production I can hear. But in a general sense I also just think of everything they do as Green Day sounding haha. Couldn't imagine listening to a rock album and complain about guitars sounding too loud 7 Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Oh look at this. Which thread had the last laugh 1 Quote
DeJennsitized Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said: Oh look at this. Which thread had the last laugh Lol hardly. There's still a RevRad thread open and the subforum will be back. Quote
Hermione Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 15 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said: Oh look at this. Which thread had the last laugh As mentioned it doesn't have to be a battle Quote
Justin1 Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Well, I'm loving RevRad but there is no question that the production on the Trilogy was pretty masterful.. As squeaky clean as a rock album can get really. The songs on RevRad (as superb as they are) have some strange volume control you can't deny. The acoustic guitar and vocals on the opening track are way too quiet. Try listening to Ordinary World and then Somewhere Now right after.. You'll see what I mean. Also, the intro to Bang Bang is cool, but from a mixing standpoint, it sounds silly when the band kicks in. It should either be on the same volume levels, or crescendo its way up to it. There are a couple other things, like the transition from Bouncing Off The Wall to Still Breathing seems off. I don't mean to sound like I'm complaining, I love RevRad, but in terms of mixing and mastering, The Trilogy is 'undeniably' better. Rob Cavallo is one of the best producers in the world. Quote
Christian's Inferno! Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 4 minutes ago, Justin1 said: Well, I'm loving RevRad but there is no question that the production on the Trilogy was pretty masterful.. As squeaky clean as a rock album can get really. The songs on RevRad (as superb as they are) have some strange volume control you can't deny. The acoustic guitar and vocals on the opening track are way too quiet. Try listening to Ordinary World and then Somewhere Now right after.. You'll see what I mean. Also, the intro to Bang Bang is cool, but from a mixing standpoint, it sounds silly when the band kicks in. It should either be on the same volume levels, or crescendo its way up to it. There are a couple other things, like the transition from Bouncing Off The Wall to Still Breathing seems off. I don't mean to sound like I'm complaining, I love RevRad, but in terms of mixing and mastering, The Trilogy is 'undeniably' better. Rob Cavallo is one of the best producers in the world. Yeah the transition from BOTW and SB seems strange to me too. I don't think SB belongs between BOTW and Youngblood, two upbeat songs. I think SB would fit better after Outlaws. Also, one thing that bothers me about Outlaws is at the end when the last word "roam" is just echoed until the song finishes. It sounds weird to me Quote
Second favourite son Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 12 minutes ago, Justin1 said: 6 minutes ago, MysticManiac said: This thread is for discussing the trilogy, the revrad thread is below. Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 11 hours ago, Jenn. said: Lol hardly. There's still a RevRad thread open and the subforum will be back. Nah Green Day aborted that. Trilogy 4 life! Quote
Guest Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 I am not a fan of the trilogy as a whole, but there are some undeniable shining moments. I can't say the same about RevRad thus far. Quote
DeJennsitized Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 16 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said: Nah Green Day aborted that. Trilogy 4 life! How many trilogy songs did Green Day play last night? Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 3 minutes ago, Jenn. said: How many trilogy songs did Green Day play last night? How many? Quote
DeJennsitized Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 3 hours ago, Steven Seagull said: How many? None Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 Just now, Jenn. said: None No wonder they suck live. Quote
DeJennsitized Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 2 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said: No wonder they suck live. Quote
HAPPY ZOMBIE UNICORN Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 1 minute ago, Steven Seagull said: No wonder they suck live. Some of the Trilogy songs rocks live. Stay the night, Let yourself go, Oh Love and X-kid were very nice moments during the last tour. Quote
Steven Seagull Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 6 minutes ago, J a c said: Some of the Trilogy songs rocks live. Stay the night, Let yourself go, Oh Love and X-kid were very nice moments during the last tour. All trilogy songs are awesome live, I said GD sucks when they don't play them. Quote
HAPPY ZOMBIE UNICORN Posted September 27, 2016 Posted September 27, 2016 6 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said: All trilogy songs are awesome live, I said GD sucks when they don't play them. Oh gosh, for a moment I heard a form of criticism for Trilogy from you. What in the heck was I thinking? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.