nowshesgone Posted Thursday at 01:30 PM Posted Thursday at 01:30 PM do keep in mind that there were some tapes that were damaged also those 3 unheard of songs that we've heard for a while that werent in the box are closely tied into Cigarettes and Valentines, so theres that as well overall, im glad it isnt Anthology 4 (which was a fucking shitshow) 1 Quote
The Grohl Posted Thursday at 01:44 PM Posted Thursday at 01:44 PM 12 hours ago, pacejunkie punk said: Saviors deluxe gave us five new songs at least. Had we gotten five never before heard tracks with this Warning boxset, we’d all be losing our shit over it. My favorite things to come out of these boxsets are songs like Black Eyeliner and Place inside my Head not to mention all the American Idiot goodies. Honestly the quality of those songs were not worth the deluxe release imo. If they would've thrown in a live show it would make that release feel worth it to me. Quote
Popular Post Mollyluna Posted Thursday at 02:00 PM Popular Post Posted Thursday at 02:00 PM 13 minutes ago, The Grohl said: Honestly the quality of those songs were not worth the deluxe release imo. If they would've thrown in a live show it would make that release feel worth it to me. I don’t know… I really love Ballyhoo, Belushi and Underdog. So for me the deluxe was worth it. As for the live show I so much hope for a Saviors live album plus DVD! Maybe for Christmas…? 5 3 Quote
nowshesgone Posted Thursday at 02:05 PM Posted Thursday at 02:05 PM 20 minutes ago, The Grohl said: Honestly the quality of those songs were not worth the deluxe release imo. If they would've thrown in a live show it would make that release feel worth it to me. that or demos+Ballyhoo and maybe Underdog and or Fuck Off (because there still needs to be a bad song on the deluxe) Quote
pacejunkie punk Posted Thursday at 02:09 PM Posted Thursday at 02:09 PM 23 minutes ago, The Grohl said: Honestly the quality of those songs were not worth the deluxe release imo. If they would've thrown in a live show it would make that release feel worth it to me. Give it twenty years 🙂 Personally I love the new songs but tbf you can’t compare a new deluxe edition of an already new album with an anniversary boxset Quote
Saviour Posted Thursday at 02:31 PM Posted Thursday at 02:31 PM Not sure I even think live stuff is necessarily added value TBH. Many of their performances have been bootlegged and shared to death on the internet since the days of P2P like Kazaa and Limewire and much of it has migrated over to YouTube. Unless it's absolutely exceptional quality like BIAB, this stuff ain't worth bundling in. The Warning anniversary live set is no better than anything you can find out there for free. I'm pretty sure I have a "Tune In, Tokyo" CD lying around here from the same tour, it's from 2001 and is no worse in quality. 2 Quote
Gonzalo17 Posted Thursday at 02:35 PM Posted Thursday at 02:35 PM 2 minutes ago, Saviour said: Not sure I even think live stuff is necessarily added value TBH. Many of their performances have been bootlegged and shared to death on the internet since the days of P2P like Kazaa and Limewire and much of it has migrated over to YouTube. Unless it's absolutely exceptional quality like BIAB, this stuff ain't worth bundling in. The Warning anniversary live set is no better than anything you can find out there for free. I'm pretty sure I have a "Tune In, Tokyo" CD lying around here from the same tour, it's from 2001 and is no worse in quality. Tune in tokyo + f.o.d. and she live from poprocks & coke single from same concert than warning 25 have either much more sound quality Quote
Nezirath270 Posted Thursday at 05:18 PM Posted Thursday at 05:18 PM I enjoyed listening to the live in tokyo from the warning boxset than the live albums from nimrod and dookie (except you woodstock 94 you're a legend) 1 Quote
Popular Post Gwen Stacy Posted Saturday at 05:58 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 05:58 PM Just now getting around to listening to all the new stuff (I'm a patient fan, I like to take my time). I thought it was interesting that more of the demos were written in first person. I always wondered if Quote And they're gonna get high, high, high when they're low, low, low The fire burns from better days was referring to the band itself. It just seemed like such a pointed line to write at that point in their career. They were in such a vice at the time. The subgenre you helped pioneer is still popular but you need to evolve as artists and if you go back and make Dookie Pt. II it might be well received but it's an implicit admission that 'yep, these are all the tricks we have in the bag'. Especially after making such a musically expansive record as Nimrod. Warning didn't set the world on fire but they'd be damned if they'd play to type and do what's been done. That's why they've had staying power in the long term. 4 4 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.