Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, GreenDayJunkie86 said:

3.) I can see water, but can a fish see air? 

I will be thinking about this one a lot

  • Like 3
Posted
21 hours ago, arcadiagay said:

I will be thinking about this one a lot

I don't wanna be a nerd, but this is my point of view. Fish are used to basically being surrounded by water, so I don't think they notice water like we do. Water is their air. It is their normal background. But, since there is a line between water and air, I am sure they can see the boundary, but not necessarily oxygen itself, just when the water ends and the air begins.

Posted
On 3/19/2026 at 5:14 PM, GreenDayJunkie86 said:

(over) Caffeinated Shower Thoughts

1.) My bathroom towel has seen some shit.


2.) Why does hot water + caffeine turn into philosophy?

 

3.) I can see water, but can a fish see air?

 

4.) How tf do you spell “caffeine?”

 

5.) Caffeine is the only thing keeping this band together. (i am the band)

 

6.) My thoughts are measurably louder than the water – I think.

 

7.) Would it be ethical to charge my dryer rent, if I hang dry everything?

(I got this email, these are not my shower thoughts :lol:)

when? I can't remember getting that one! I hope it's not artificial inteligence writing these because I really like them!

Posted
1 hour ago, Long Lost King of Fools said:

when? I can't remember getting that one! I hope it's not artificial inteligence writing these because I really like them!

I think I got that email the day I posted it :happy:.

I'm sure they don't...hopefully. I don't know how the boys feel about AI (artificial intelligence, not American Idiot lol), but I am 100% against it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email I got today lol :lol:

The Charge

Leaving a single, useless sip in the pot and walking away.

Evidence

Exhibit A: Exactly one sip. Never two. More than zero. 100% chaos.

Exhibit B: The leftover amount is scientifically useless

Exhibit C: While technically "not empty" – it is legally suspicious.

 

Defense (weak)

The defendant claims: "I didn't want to waste it... it looked like there was more in the pot.." and "I was in a rush." 

The court finds this behavior – bullshit at best.

 

Verdict

Guilty. Guilty as hell.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...