Okay so some beleive all what history books,channles,and anything else that has to do with history and some beleive none or very little of it. So my question is how much of it do you beleive?

What parts of history don't you believe Bonnie ?

I dont know. Theres just little things that dont really make all that much sense to me and makes me not beleive it


btw,your sig is very hyptonizing and funny

I believe most of it.

Except the part about dinosaurs, I think some of that is bull.

humm. i think i beleive it all lol.
theres very few pieces of history that are belevied to be true, that i disagreee with. i dont think atlantis was real , but once again thats nowhere near proven.

dinosaurs own

an old history teacher once said every single government changed the history in a way they liked .

I hate history, and every form of it. The only reason why it's taught in schools is because we aren't supposed to let history repeat itself. Bullshit -- Hitler was a modern day Napoleon, and the leader of Korea is like a modern day Hitler. Abe Lincoln was assissnated, and so was John F. Kennedy. No offense, we already are repeating history.

i dont see any need for it to be fake.
culturally biased yes, but not wrong.

I believe in all history, except the biblical kind (such as "the great flood", the parting of the red sea, that stuff).

i belive all of it except the history of a "god" and that bollocks.

some is very accurate but i don't like too much religion, that's opinion not history.
I think it'salso very hard to be exact so not all history is right like London fire... that took ages to fit together logically

I believe most of history.

i believe history. a few things, that were handed down through oral tradition aren't as believeable, but for the most part yes.

i believe history. i dont know why there wouldnt be a reason to believe if they have facts.
example: dinosaurs, they have bones of them; so i believe it

I believe in most of it except all that Bible-God bullshit. Lies, lies, lies.

i believe in most of it but, like someone posted earlier, history is repeating itself. i mean, my history teacher has a poster of JFK and Lincoln and 'coincedence?' above it.


and i dont really belive in the biblical crap.

As we all know, the holocaust never happened.

Since history is always an interpretation of someone, I use to be critical with all that I read and try to read many diferent views.

I love reading history books.
especially WWII

i like history.
except for parts in the bible, Such as jesus rising from the dead

exactly. i would just sit there and stare with the 'wtf look' on my face whenever we were in sunday school. i never wanted to be there though, but my mom made us..

i almost had a fight with a person in my class over that, he couldnt accept my opinion and afterwards though i was athsesist for not beleivving Jesus rose From the Dead

^

I believe it, but in the books it's shown from a very one-sided point of view. Also, some of the "ugly" points in history are swept under the rug and are not the kind of things that are shown to us.

Which reminds me, US History final exam tomorow, whoo.

Is that sarcasm?


Yeah, same here! It's very interesting

I find history boring. I do believe in most of it except for some things.

i don't know.... i guessi beleive most of it but not all of it, and i think some things had happened but much differently than it says in a textbook or something

I believe there's probably some truth to most everything they tell us. Maybe even 90% of it could be true. I don't think the faults are all because of people lying to try to hide things or anything, though, but just because of how artifacts can be misinterrpreted and things like that.

I've always thought it would be interesting to see how would civilizan would be describe to students centuries from now.

bullshit

Fer real. I don't know where people come up with that idea, but it's rediculous.

Most of it.
And just for the record, people who don't believe that the Halocaust existed are ignorant bastards
Just thought I'd throw that in there.

hey now, the past is told by those who win my darlin, wat matters is what hasnt been
so yea, take a leson from jimmy eat world, all one sided

haha imagine history text books if germany won ww2.
"so we caringly took the jews for nice warm showers... but they are alergic to water and died...tragic *coff*german ownz yall*coff*"



good luck in ur exam

I hate when people deny it

as for other history or history in general...whatever.
I dont have a belief in any of it. if it's factual, then ok, thanks for telling me
although I always bug my mom that the story of Jesus is fictional- she's turning Catholic
and we always have debates about it. I say facts before fiction. Logic and evidence before storytelling

Okay, I believe most of history, minus the religious stuff, mostly because hundreds of years ago, all these guys decided to pick and choose what people would believe in and then changed stuff (they also mention this in the Da Vinci Code, remember how they made Jesus into a supernatural being, and cut out Mary Magdalen's stuff? But, just for the record, I learned this stuff in History class.... not just from a "fictitious" book).

hahaha. i go to a catholic school and my religion teacher spends most lessons complaing about the da vinci code
"how dare they"
"its rubish, just rubish"
"that book is a discrace"

with the religion stuff, i believe in it, but thats just how i was rased

Well, I was always curious... if the church is so adament that it's completely fictional, how come they're so against it?

Methinks they doth protest too much.....

I believe every part of history except the religious aspects of it.

haha good question . i dont realy care, people can believe and say what they want. my religion teacher is kinda weird thouhg, he done the same thing about the pasion of the crist cause
"mel gibson made it to be intertaining" well duh, its a movie lol.

i think that the church is agains the pasion of the christ cause they dont want jesus to look like a man whore

Yeah, that would be kind of awkward.

shit i said the rong movie...that made no sence, let me do that again

i think that the church is agains the da vinci code cause they dont want jesus to look like a man whore

with all that mary mag stuff

My friends wanted to reenact the last supper. I was going to be Mary Magdolin.

well acordin 2 da vinci u amke babies wiht jesus, arnt u the popular one

I really hope you're foreign...

Agreed.

depends on the source.
They sugarcoat everything in my school book and make America look like the greatest thing ever.

And alot of people put there own spin on stuff or leave details out
I think it helps to expose yourself to as much as you can and try and put the pieces togetther.

That is exactly like my history book.

Sorry to quote a musical- but this sums it up

"...we believe all sorts of
things that aren't true. We call it - "history."
A man's called a traitor - or liberator
A rich man's a thief - or philanthropist
Is one a crusader - or ruthless invader?
It's all in which label
Is able to persist"

You can never truly know what happened unless you were there.

^ Wow...

lol i cant spell or type, im sorry. ill try harder